THE SCIENCE

AI and reinforcement learning, grounded in process physics.

Our models stay reliable outside the range of measured data because the physics of your process is built into them. What follows is a sample of the methods we use, running live.

LIVE / PHYSICS-INFORMED OPTIMISATION
PLANT SIMULATORPHYSICS-INFORMED MODELRUN 0000ITER 000● SOLVING
SETPOINTS
FEED RATE0 t/h
REACTOR TEMP0 °C
EXCESS O₂0.0 %
RECYCLE0 %
PDE RESIDUAL1.0e+0
OUTCOMES VS BASELINE
MARGIN
+0.0%
EMISSIONS
−0.0%
ENERGY / t
0.0
YIELD
0.0%
WASTE
0.0%
CONFIDENCE
0%
01 / REINFORCEMENT LEARNING + PROCESS PHYSICS

Control that learns the coupling.

An agent explores setpoint changes inside a simulation of your process, so it learns how throughput, energy and quality move together before anything reaches the plant. A conventional controller keeps hunting around its target because it never sees that coupling.

The physics keeps the exploration inside conditions the plant can actually reach, which is what makes the learned policy usable on real equipment.

02 / PHYSICS-INFORMED BAYESIAN + UQ

Every prediction carries its uncertainty.

Measurement noise, sensor drift and model error propagate through the calculation instead of being averaged away. Operators see how confident a recommendation is, and how that confidence decays the further ahead it looks.

These are the real inaccuracies of operation, and treating them explicitly is what keeps a forecast honest.

03 / ML-ACCELERATED SIMULATION

Thousands of scenarios per shift.

A numerical solver can take minutes for a single scenario. We train surrogate models on solver output that reproduce the same field in milliseconds, at the accuracy the decision needs.

That speed is what turns simulation from an engineering study into something the plant can use every shift.

See what these methods find in your plant.

A short call with our engineering team, your process data stays on site.